I didn’t realise that the console versions were so far behind in terms of mp ability that it is not possible for more players than those involved in a Sunday league footy match at the park (11vs11!!!) to play against each other! 9vs9 the future? – don’t make me laugh! Why bring the pc version back 2 decades? Even 1987 MIDI Maze supported 8-a-side and that was the first mp 1st prsn shooter invented!

9vs9 – a more enjoyable and realistic experience – I’m in a warzone, I’m in Afghanistan where troops are organised into 30-man combat platoons, ‘REALISM’ = absolute minimum of 30 a side capability for those who want it! Got no problem with a 9vs9, hell a 1vs1 is all good if it turns u on! But as an OPTION not as the ONLY choice! – it sure don’t do it for me and my mates anyways!!

If I were chief: airstrikes and dogs would be dropped or at least limited CHRIST!, bigger maps + vehicles would be a must, age 3+ deathmatches would be banned, a proper system of rank would be implemented with single shot kills to the leg – lol becoming a thing of the past.. hold on… it just occurred to me… heard of Battlefield anyone? I may just be off 4good this time! – someone plz remind me why I’m gonna stick with IW & Activision’s ‘next gen’ mp console raped game???

I thought it was cool… anyways, the link is from the official EA – Battlefield web site.

I hope you will guess what the blacked out parts are ))

http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Check_5F00_Blog01.jpg

There is only one thing I have to say to Infinity Ward and Activision, I have a copy of the orginal Call Of Duty in my draw. They should remeber the reason why we have Call Of Duty, the fact it started on PC. The way the PC community has been teated, they have many people, hardcore fans (the people who actually spend months and months perfecting their skills, who truly love the game) completely and utterly fucked off. You DO NOT treat your fans in this way. Its also the fact that they are “upping” the price and at the same time, offering less to PC gamers. If it was they had “upped” the price and offered dedicated servers than IW and Activision wouldnt be in this situation.

I own both a PC and 360, and its situations like this that make me want to sell my PC and then just go back to console gaming, seems console gamin is just getting more love these days =[

There have been some DLC that is so outrageous that it should be illegal. One “DLC” has you pay to unlock content that’s already on the game disc you’ve already purchased! Others require you to buy their Multiplayer component, or pay for something so ridiculous that it should be a fun free unlockable somewhere in the game. And people buy those like it’s crack.

I was talking about it in a forum before and I had everyone agree with me but be like: “I just bought the Bethesda’s Horse Armor because I love Oblivion but that’s it, I completely agree with you.” Buddy, if you did that, you don’t agree with me because you don’t know what the fuck I’m talking about in the first place.

The fact that the companies screw you over is your own damn fault. The only thing that will make them stop is when they see less profit. That is the one and only thing that these companies understand. Otherwise, they will continue testing how much they can get away with because they can afford it, thanks to us.

FUCK ‘EM. Serouisly, I have had it with the BS around the game and I am going to give them the silent treatment… Well okay from now on.

My real Battle Cry of the week goes out to Assassins Creed Duo (II) or whatever you wanna name it. This game is going to be incredible. They picked up where they left of with the story, i really enjoyed the genetic heritage way to play within the first game, and it only is gonna get better. Who are you, who was your family, why have they kidnapped you etc. Yes AC 1 had it flaws, for example some repetitive gameplay elements, but the story was so well executed, it didn’t bother me for one second. If there is a game that I AM going to buy its Assassins Creed 2. And I dont mean that im going to pirate other games, cause im not
Ooh and by the way, that 15 minutes short film, though it was kinda corny portrait, it does bring a bit more life in the background of Ezio

Greetings from the Netherlands (and NO not Amsterdam ),
Tim

On last week’s show, you guys were touching base on the whole Left 4 Dead 2 Avatar rewards system and avatars in general between the Xbox 360 Avatars, and PS3’s Home. This got me thinking about Sony’s plan, or lack of one, to bring more expressive ways to customize your profile and your themes on the Playstation 3.

In firmware update 3.00, they added in Dynamic Themes and the ABILITY to have new avatars, which is a great bunch of new features that PS3 owners have been begging for. It’s been over 2 months since that firmware update, and the most we’ve seen is maybe 4 dynamic themes and zero new avatars. Why is it that when Sony announces a plan it sounds great on paper, but when it comes down to putting it in action, it’s almost always a letdown? For the record, I love my PS3, but I just think Sony needs to treat their customer base with a little more consideration.

This is the worst year for PC gamers in history. You don’t need to be an Einsten to see that control is what fuels this industry. With consoles getting networking support, publishers and studios realised that they can do whatever they want, whenever they want, online! Farming DLCs, increasing prices, ads… the list goes on.
Supporting PCs is not viable, not because of piracy, but because you cannot control your player base.