The real problem with AC unity: Ubisoft Development

I'm gonna keep this relatively concise and cut the crap out what (to some people's chargin) has been one of the gaming stories of the week. First off, I'm going to take gender completely out of the equation after this part here, it's a topic that people get sensitive and distracted about either way, and neither side really communicates anything that way. So if you're bothered by that coming up around this, read on.

The real problem is with the development process. One of two thing's is seriously wrong with Ubisoft's claim, I'm inclined to think both. First off it was probably decided early on that you would only play as one character in the game, single or multiplayer, and making any other character male or female was just never considered because they wanted to build all modes around the one chatracter. But creative reasons weren't the reasons they stated, and that's why this became a thing. 

The other issue is cost. If your mutliplayer mode can't even support the concept of different male player chaacters without large expensive, something about the development process of having a shared pipeline between studios based in Montreal-based team, in conjunction with nine other studios from Toronto, Kiev, Singapore, Shanghai, Annecy, Montpellier, Bucharest, Quebec and Chengdu. Bear in mind that Ubisoft Toronto ALONE is over 800 people. And the fact 10 seperate studios are working on unity had already been confirmed.

This all points to from narrow pre-production and a stilted development process. If the animation rigging wasn't made unisex, or even to support other kinds of males, that just limits the usefullness of the resource to begin with, and if adding any other character is prohibitively expensive to do, then you're doing something wrong. I at least, am complaining about their statements because the development process isn't agile enough to incorporate changes. The team claims that playing as a female character was  'until very recently', they also claim the game has been in development since 2010. If it took you the better part of 4 years and being months away from release to decide you couldn't finish doing such work for something so baseline on your build list, then something needs to change. With an october release date, and with starting 4 years ago, you're either in far enough that you have to se it through to justify your investment, or you weren't working on the feature at all in order to cut it 'very recently'. 

To be clear, I don't think I or many other people are actually talking about the AC: Unity statements because we want/expect them to make an insincere change to pander to pressure, it's questioning the reason not to state creative reasons and how bloated you can let a development process get when these games are being officially revealed and released within months of the two events. I mean, we'd be complaining about it too if Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel was announced and every player had to be willhelm.

Views: 108

Comment by Abel2Disable on June 17, 2014 at 8:07pm

I agree it seems Ubisoft wasn't honest with their reasoning for not including a female character. That's not cool, no one likes being lied to. I do believe it was simply a creative decision, as you mentioned. Ubisoft was in a tough situation answering that question. If they say it was a creative decision, does that absolve them of all scrutiny that's commonly associated with the 'gender in gaming' topic? I don't think so. Not everyone, especially those sensitive to the subject, respect creative decision. Seems like Ubisoft was just trying to avoid a shit storm by saying it wasn't possible. No matter the reasoning, there will always be criticism surrounding this topic, it's unavoidable. They should've just been honest. Only in this case, the truth shall not set you free.

Comment by Rowan - AzureCantabile on June 17, 2014 at 8:11pm

Don't you remember? Nothing is true. :P

But no, really I think there's bigger implications about the flawed paradigm of having 10 studios work on an assassin's creed game every year and one of them work on a game for 3 years in secret to annoucne it a couple of months before going gold.

And as for gender... I'm tired of just getting replies that have nothing to do with what I said, I'm not getting into that again. People just hear what they want to hear.

Comment

You need to be a member of EpicBattleAxe to add comments!

Join EpicBattleAxe

The War Chest

Rankings

The Axe Factor Poll!

What's YOUR take on online-anonymity vis a vis vitriol
It is fundamentally destroying the internet and it has to end.0%
Online privacy is more important than rude people being rude 0%
Having "internet police" deal with this issue seems reasonable to me0%
The internet has evolved just fine without gatekeepers, I'd like to keep it that way0%

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Community Blogs

The Axe Factor 177: The Breast Tactic

Bug spray cannot save you from The Axe Factor! This week, we're checking out a Kickstarter for #TheFlameAndTheFlood, the Axehead-developed #StrengthOfTheSword3, and dive into part 1 of our epic conversation on #GamerGate. 

-Download-

This Week:

What We’re Watching:…

Meet my Shepard

Fresh new start, She's an Renegade/Infiltrator I'm going to go kick some ass now

Axehead Assembly #49: Death Race, Anyone?

Prepare to target the oldies for extra points because the Axehead Assembly is back and has been nomiated as the designated driver! (advice: Seatbelts)

On this week's rough and tumble show we discuss replaying games. What games do the Assembly like to replay and how often do we do so? Answers…

Identifying with games and game characters

This is actually just a copy-paste of my most recent comment on this weeks Axe Factor. I've long intended this as a blog post, which is why it appears here as well.

I haven't heard the podcast yet, but I felt like writing a response to the question to this weeks poll, "Have you ever had a "That's Me!" experience with a video game character?"

The answer is yes. One of the most powerful gaming experiences for me the last couple of years have been To The…

The Axe Factor 176: "Interesting" Doesn't Necessarily Mean "Good"

Incendiary rounds cannot save you from The Axe Factor! This week, we check out a Kickstarter from some ex-Bioshock devs, bask in the glow of Far Cry 4's latest promo vids, discuss the positive racial aspects of Sleeping Dogs, and go hands-on with Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor.

-Download-

This Week:

What We’re…

Forum

Going to the new website?

Started by Karoc in Site Discussions. Last reply by torhal 19 hours ago. 18 Replies

Just curious how many Axeheads are going to be heading over to the new website, once Lorin and Brent get it up and running?I will be for sure.Continue

What has Epic Battle Cry / Epic Battle Axe meant to you?

Started by Michael Esguerra in Site Discussions. Last reply by Karim R. on Friday. 15 Replies

I'm kind of surprised that no one has started this topic yet, but with the recent announcement of Epic Battle Cry coming to an end, I thought a lot of people, like me, would like to share their…Continue

Tags: Axe, EpicBattleAxe, EpicBattleCry, Epic, Cry

What TV?

Started by Docwoor in Off-Topic Discussions. Last reply by Scott Quertinmont Oct 14. 8 Replies

Hey guys!I'm moving to a new place soon and I'm looking forward to buying a brand new TV and a PS4. Woohoo :DI've done some research and I've hit some sort of a dead end. Do i get an FullHD Tv or…Continue

Ending something that lost its... touch?

Started by Alexander in Off-Topic Discussions Oct 10. 0 Replies

Well let me say at the beginning, the end of EBC showd me that i now feel like i missed out on something huge i could have been part of here on EBA. I posted once a discussion and had some nice talks…Continue

© 2014   Created by Lorin Baumgarten.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service